Skip to content

Assurance Packs as a release artifact

How to treat evidence like a build output: versioned packs, diffs between releases, and lightweight sign-off.

  • assurance
  • evaluation
  • release
  • governance

Most teams treat a model release as “a new binary” (or a new endpoint). But in high-stakes settings, the thing you actually ship is: the model plus the evidence that it’s fit for purpose.

That’s the idea behind an Assurance Pack: a versioned bundle of artefacts that makes your release defensible.

The release artefact mindset

In software, a release produces:

  • a build output (binary/container)
  • a changelog
  • tests + reports (CI output)

For ML, a release should produce:

  • the model (weights/config)
  • evaluation outputs (metrics + slices + failure notes)
  • risk notes (what can go wrong, mitigations)
  • monitoring plan (what you’ll watch, thresholds, actions, owners)
  • traceability (what ran, on which data, from which commit)

An Assurance Pack is simply a standard way to package those things.

Why this helps (even before “compliance”)

Treating evidence as a release artefact forces two healthy disciplines:

  1. Reproducibility by default
    If you can’t re-run the evaluation and re-create the summary, your release is fragile.

  2. Diffs between releases
    When every release emits a pack, you can compare:

    • metric deltas
    • slice regressions
    • new failure modes
    • monitoring changes
    • policy/guardrail shifts

That turns “we changed the model” into “we can show what changed and why it’s acceptable”.

A lightweight sign-off flow

You don’t need a committee. Start with a simple rule:

  • No pack → no deploy
  • Pack produced → engineer + owner sign-off

A minimal sign-off checklist:

  • Intended use / out of scope is still accurate
  • Key metrics meet your thresholds
  • No critical slice regression
  • Monitoring plan updated for new risks
  • Traceability complete (commit hash, data version, run ID)

How Ormedian thinks about packs

Our default bias is developer-first:

  • packs should be folder-based (works with Git)
  • should be buildable in CI
  • should be diffable
  • should be small enough to maintain, but strict enough to matter

What’s next

Over time, teams tend to want:

  • pack templates per domain (vision, NLP, tabular)
  • automated slice suites
  • pack registries with approvals and audit trails

But the first win is simple: make evidence a standard output of every release.

If you’re building something high-stakes and want to adopt this early, join the waitlist — we’ll share templates and a reference implementation.

Join the waitlist

Get early access to Ormedian tools for assurance packs, monitoring, and provenance.

Join waitlist