Assurance Packs as a release artifact
How to treat evidence like a build output: versioned packs, diffs between releases, and lightweight sign-off.
- assurance
- evaluation
- release
- governance
Most teams treat a model release as “a new binary” (or a new endpoint). But in high-stakes settings, the thing you actually ship is: the model plus the evidence that it’s fit for purpose.
That’s the idea behind an Assurance Pack: a versioned bundle of artefacts that makes your release defensible.
The release artefact mindset
In software, a release produces:
- a build output (binary/container)
- a changelog
- tests + reports (CI output)
For ML, a release should produce:
- the model (weights/config)
- evaluation outputs (metrics + slices + failure notes)
- risk notes (what can go wrong, mitigations)
- monitoring plan (what you’ll watch, thresholds, actions, owners)
- traceability (what ran, on which data, from which commit)
An Assurance Pack is simply a standard way to package those things.
Why this helps (even before “compliance”)
Treating evidence as a release artefact forces two healthy disciplines:
-
Reproducibility by default
If you can’t re-run the evaluation and re-create the summary, your release is fragile. -
Diffs between releases
When every release emits a pack, you can compare:- metric deltas
- slice regressions
- new failure modes
- monitoring changes
- policy/guardrail shifts
That turns “we changed the model” into “we can show what changed and why it’s acceptable”.
A lightweight sign-off flow
You don’t need a committee. Start with a simple rule:
- No pack → no deploy
- Pack produced → engineer + owner sign-off
A minimal sign-off checklist:
- Intended use / out of scope is still accurate
- Key metrics meet your thresholds
- No critical slice regression
- Monitoring plan updated for new risks
- Traceability complete (commit hash, data version, run ID)
How Ormedian thinks about packs
Our default bias is developer-first:
- packs should be folder-based (works with Git)
- should be buildable in CI
- should be diffable
- should be small enough to maintain, but strict enough to matter
What’s next
Over time, teams tend to want:
- pack templates per domain (vision, NLP, tabular)
- automated slice suites
- pack registries with approvals and audit trails
But the first win is simple: make evidence a standard output of every release.
If you’re building something high-stakes and want to adopt this early, join the waitlist — we’ll share templates and a reference implementation.
Join the waitlist
Get early access to Ormedian tools for assurance packs, monitoring, and provenance.
Join waitlist